<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is this?</title>
	<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/</link>
	<description>A blog about geology, geoscience, paleontology and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: personnic</title>
		<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-271</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-271</guid>
					<description>http://www.geolsba.dk/echinoids/listeCampan.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href='http://www.geolsba.dk/echinoids/listeCampan.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.geolsba.dk/echinoids/listeCampan.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mark</title>
		<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-226</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-226</guid>
					<description>It looks rather like the various limonite &amp;amp; other concretions/zones that I've seen in the New Jersey &amp;amp; Maryland Coastal Plain Cretaceous units. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It looks rather like the various limonite &amp; other concretions/zones that I&#8217;ve seen in the New Jersey &amp; Maryland Coastal Plain Cretaceous units.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Antimonite</title>
		<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-223</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-223</guid>
					<description>Silver Fox: Thanks for your input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Silver Fox: Thanks for your input.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Silver Fox</title>
		<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-222</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-222</guid>
					<description>I think the heaviness has got to be from the contained iron. The rock reminds me of ferricrete - but that is mostly the color; they do not usually consist of mudstones or siltstones. The only part of it that looks at all fragmental like a ferricret is in the top photo near the top of the rock, where the disruption is probably wavy bedding. But it does make me wonder if Fe-rich solutions from a nearby (or palaeo) spring didn't seep through this mudstone. I can't add much of anything to the origin of the rock other than it looks sedimentary, and is pretty neat looking! Would be great to find The Source!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the heaviness has got to be from the contained iron. The rock reminds me of ferricrete - but that is mostly the color; they do not usually consist of mudstones or siltstones. The only part of it that looks at all fragmental like a ferricret is in the top photo near the top of the rock, where the disruption is probably wavy bedding. But it does make me wonder if Fe-rich solutions from a nearby (or palaeo) spring didn&#8217;t seep through this mudstone. I can&#8217;t add much of anything to the origin of the rock other than it looks sedimentary, and is pretty neat looking! Would be great to find The Source!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Antimonite</title>
		<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-221</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-221</guid>
					<description>Brian: Theres no grading what I can see in the matrix on close inspection. It seems solid. &lt;strong&gt; Ive added two more photos.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Brian: Theres no grading what I can see in the matrix on close inspection. It seems solid. <strong> Ive added two more photos.</strong>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: BrianR</title>
		<link>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-220</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://antimonite.blogsome.com/2009/01/18/what-is-this/#comment-220</guid>
					<description>It has some crude bedding to it ... and there are parts that look like they have a bit of soft-sediment deformation (i.e., bits and blobs of sand stringers 'floating' in the finer-grained matrix).

There's no 'smoking gun' diagnostic feature that I can see in these photos to help pinpoint a process interpretation. If one really wanted to know, they could thin section the finer-grained parts to see if there is any very subtle variations in grain size vertically. It would be nice to know if the finer-grained part is homogenous, or does it have any grading? Any very fine structure?

At this point I'd be hard-pressed to guess at an origin for this rock ... need to ponder a bit more. Maybe others have offer some good insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It has some crude bedding to it &#8230; and there are parts that look like they have a bit of soft-sediment deformation (i.e., bits and blobs of sand stringers &#8216;floating&#8217; in the finer-grained matrix).</p>
	<p>There&#8217;s no &#8217;smoking gun&#8217; diagnostic feature that I can see in these photos to help pinpoint a process interpretation. If one really wanted to know, they could thin section the finer-grained parts to see if there is any very subtle variations in grain size vertically. It would be nice to know if the finer-grained part is homogenous, or does it have any grading? Any very fine structure?</p>
	<p>At this point I&#8217;d be hard-pressed to guess at an origin for this rock &#8230; need to ponder a bit more. Maybe others have offer some good insights.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
